written by a naverage man
…could be perceived (by some) as better than committed-relationship sex:
· you can get what you want.
you can even manufacture “burning desire” (etc.) in your mind. after the sex is over, you can do whatever you want (e.g. sleep, watch the game, etc.). no strings.
let’s contrast this with committed-relationship sex:
· you might not even get it!
· a worst-case scenario would be akin to begging for nourishment, getting scraps, and getting those scraps from someone who could care less (or even despise you for it).
almost everyone knows someone (almost everyone? in a committed-relationship) who is not happy with his/her sex life within that relationship.
as i often deduce, the problem herein doesn’t lie within the people, per se… but the construct of conventional u.s.a. committed-relationships (e.g. cohabitation, marriage, monogamy rules, etc.).
as virtual sex becomes more-and-more affordable & available, conventional, u.s.a.-type committed-relationships may be perceived (by some) as having less and less value.
___________________________________
[i] martino, j. (7.18-1.2024). why virtual sex... book 118: night & day game. © 2024 by j. martino.
[ii] note that ‘virtual’ can refer to masturbation, robotic sex, prostitution, etc. virtually anything besides conventional-relationship sex.

.jpg)



