once upon a time
one time when (time stood still)
once upon a rhyme
one time (it all-ways will)
_________________________________
my fascination with biblical scholarship continues to reveal astounding realizations:
1. nobody knows who the original authors were.
2. nobody knows how many times the stories were changed, in word-of-mouth his-story.
3. nobody knows how the scribes (who are also anonymous) changed the stories.
4. anybody who has ever translated anything (especially poetry & song*) knows that the meanings (especially the artistic, double-entendre meanings) will change.
* hint: the bible is in "verses."
5. scholars can only speculate as to why certain gospels were included in various versions, while certain gospels were left out of other versions.**
** note: a "gospel" is a "teaching" or a "revelation" of Christ, and a "version" is an interpretation. that doesn't mean that it is true. quite the contrary. think about the stories you hear about others (family members, friends, acquaintances, neighbors, politicians, celebrities, "holy" people...).
present conclusion: the evidence for a loving, biblical god (and a god-man Jesus) is errant, contradictory, dated, edited, translated, piecemeal, and miniscule.
the evidence against is strong:
deductions:
1. men made it all up.
2. it's mostly bullsh--.
to be a mom means having been the same person as your off-spring-ings (literally, for 9-ish months). there is no way that anyone but a mom could understand that kind of unconditional love.
on this day, we can think back and re-collect... about mom.
1. girls in tight yoga pants with "hands-to-heart-center" -- who are wearing headsets and doing poses outside of the lennyboy brewery... might be spiritually-evolved souls in meditative bliss... or ...they might be advertising.
2. guys (in pajamas) practicing outdoor yoga in the parking lot of a brewery... have their minds on something else (besides namaste').
3. in regard to "chris's choice!" of wines (at total wine)... there might not even be a "chris"!
4. when one reads the gospel of paul (according to luke) in the king james version of the bible... neither paul nor luke nor james wrote down a word of it. it's like someone telling a tall tale about your grandmother -- even though he never ever met your grandmother and he isn't even a member of your family!
5. when the billboard says "$1000 off your next breast augmentation" ...consider paying the extra $1000.
6. the translation of "top dollar for your home, guaranteed today!" is: "we will low-ball you on your home (today) if you are stupid enough to believe in us, today."
7. "he is coming soon!" ...uh... 2000 years later??? hmmm... it makes one One-der what "soon" means.
8. if you read a bar sign that says "free beer tomorrow" ...and if you show up tomorrow (and the sign still says "free beer tomorrow") ...and if you show up the next day, expecting free beer??? well, i'm going to fire you as my advisor.
9. ambulance-chasing lawyers will gouge insurance companies for just-about as much as they can (as a windfall for you) -- which happens to be just-about as much as your legal bill.
10. f--- that.
11. in regard to statement #1, above... the girl with the obvious camel-toe doesn't not know that she is sporting an obvious camel-toe.
Uni-Verse-All Oneness (for whatever reason) big-bang-divided into apparently separate parts...
(and there was disparity).
nothing in this Uni-Verse happens without a disparity of pressure... seeking to release itself into a pairing, or a Oneness (a Yolk, a Yog, a Une).
disparity of pressure.
"we" have an all-knowing, all-seeing, all-loving god. he sent his only son, the lord jesus christ, to die... for y/our sins. check that. he died for believer's sins.
he has already killed his children and has set-up his (only) son's crucifixion, so (of course) he won't blink an eye -- if you choose to die -- as a non-believer.
in Love, we pray, Amen.
those who have completed the third grade (and who are not watching fox news) understand the term "independence". it refers to people being able to survive/thrive, without depending upon others.
wayne dyer & steven covey used-to speak of inter-dependence, which alluded to the fact that we, as living beings on planet earth, are independent -- yet cooperative/dependent upon each other.
martino, however, coined the term "inter-independence".
inter-independence recognizes the interdependence of all living things. additionally, inter-independence subscribes to the idea that we have the ability to be helping each other become more independent of us.
this flies in the face of conventional u.s.a. relationship theory, which seems to throw-back to the idea that we "should" need each other and "complete" each other... in order to be "whole".
no.
inter-independence is a Higher Vibration.
inter-independence (Love) aspires to assist others into becoming more and more of their own selves... it values autonomy, choice, self-regulation and self-realization.
in simple terms: you want someone who you Love to experience his/her best experience, even if it is inter-independent of your-self.
if there is a man that is one-of-a-kind, it's anthony squillacci jr.
it's 4/27/22. my tasks:
wednesday:
passover: to pass over critical portions of a 'holy' book because (a) it is hard to read, (b) it is hard to understand, (c) i'm bored, or (d) i'm tired.
it is similar to flying in an airplane ((insomuch as one can pass over the cities, the gouging of the earth, the pollution, and the violence without really paying any attention to it...)) and then believing the foxy newscastmakers.