Showing posts with label risk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label risk. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 15, 2020

b89 (4.15-2.2020): i'm off (to risk my life)

 
i’m off (to risk my life)  [i]         
by grocer y. s. hopping
 
i’m off, to risk my life (as everybody knows)
i’m off to risk my life, to risk my life:
 
at trader joe’s
__________________
 
·       to be quite honest, i’m happy just to be able to shower, drive, and shop.  if trader joes is the death knell that finally takes me out, i’ll attempt to sip a little two-buck chuck as my final toast!



[i] martino, j. (4.15-2.2020). i’m off (to risk my life). book 89: april fools. © 2020 by joal martino.

[ii]“two buck chuck” is trader joe’s “economy” wine.

Tuesday, March 24, 2020

b88 (3.24-2.2020): some simple covid math

some simple covid math [1]         
by s. uriv 
 
will sheltering and lockdown make all viri go away, or
will viri come back again in just some other way?
 
will not continued risk bequest the uninfected path?
will lockdowns ever end?
 
some simple covid math
______________________________
 
these are just thoughts… written as a layman, based upon the news i’ve seen (which, admittedly) is limited.
 
1.      if covid-19 is less harmful than the flu to the average person, yet more harmful to those who are aged and/or immunocompromised… then the key should be to protect those at risk (through extreme social isolation).
   a.      …but… will “sheltering in place” and “lockdowns” make the virus go away?  no.
   b.      will it make the aged any younger?  no.
   c.       will sheltering boost the immune systems of the immunocompromised?  no.   
   d.      will it make the aged & immunocompromised immune?  no.
         i.     …so… when those at-risk are (eventually) exposed, they are going to be in the same boat.
         ii.     it seems as though the aged and immunocompromised are going to be at-risk for viri until (1) we produce vaccines that work, and/or (2) the virus goes away. 

2.      aren’t the aged and the immunocompromised still going to still be at risk for the next virus?  …and the subsequent one?  yes.  they are.

3.      if we were to “lock down” the country for 2-3 weeks… would the virus “go away”?  would the flu go away?  i’m not sure about covid-19, but lockdowns (i’d wager) won’t kill all viri.
 
i don’t get the math on this.
 
seems to me that everyone should get out there and get the virus, and/or take whatever precautions that he/she deems necessary to avoid the virus (e.g. washing hands, distancing, sheltering).  the immunocompromised need to be more diligent!
 
in the meantime, make more masks, make more ventilators, and recognize that people are going to get sick, and (some) are going to die – just like they would if they got the flu.
 
i might be one of those people who has a lung issue from childhood that might respond the wrong way.  i’m over 60, so i’m more at risk.  i would need to take all of that into consideration.  still, i’d rather be on the exposed/recovered team than the uninfected team.
 
truth is, we don’t know who is going to get sick.  we don’t know who is going to get really sick, and who is going to get really, really sick.
 
protect your grandparents and your asthmatics and your smokers.  maybe those groups should be the ones who are sheltering at home, for their own sake.
 
(more to follow as we find out more)
_________________________
[1] martino, j. (3.24-2.2020). some simple covid math. book 88: marching into madness. © 2020 by wellnesseducation.us.